Evaluation of sealed joint performance for the selection of sealants suitable for use in autoclaved lightweight concrete panels

  1. Get@NRC: Evaluation of sealed joint performance for the selection of sealants suitable for use in autoclaved lightweight concrete panels (Opens in a new window)
DOIResolve DOI: http://doi.org/10.1520/STP154520120018
AuthorSearch for: ; Search for: ; Search for: ; Search for: ; Search for:
Proceedings titleASTM Special Technical Publication
Conference4th Durability of Building and Construction Sealants and Adhesives, 16 June 2011 through 17 June 2011, Anaheim, CA
Volume1545 STP
Pages385403; # of pages: 19
SubjectEarthquake load; Expansion and contraction; External walls; Joint fracture; Joint movement; Joint performance; Lightweight concrete panel; Long term performance; Low modulus; Modulus; Normal concretes; Sealant products; Shear joints; Shear tests; Static and dynamic; Test specimens; Two-component; Wall panels; Adhesion; Adhesives; Concrete slabs; Construction; Durability; Fatigue of materials; Fatigue testing; Fracture; Precast concrete; Substrates; Walls (structural partitions); Sealants
AbstractThe strength of autoclaved lightweight concrete (ALC) is evidently lower than that of normal concrete. Therefore, when movement occurs at a sealed joint between ALC panels, the sealant is required to deform and remain intact without damaging the ALC substrate. However, there is currently not sufficient information to permit evaluation of the expected performance of sealants applied to ALC substrates. In this study, static and dynamic tests were carried out in order to obtain an index that could be used to select the modulus of a sealant that can be expected to provide long-term performance when applied to an ALC substrate. To develop this index, an initial study was carried out in order to clarify actual joint movement between ALC panels of buildings; the expansion and contraction at the joint were measured, and shear joint movement was calculated based on the expected story-to-story drift of an external wall due to earthquake loads. Thereafter, in a subsequent stage of the study, five types of two-component polyurethane sealant products, of different elastic modulus, were subjected to tensile and shear tests from which the relationship between stress and the type of joint fracture was determined. The results from these tests revealed that when the stress is greater than 0.6 to 0.7 N/mm2, the ALC substrate is more easily fractured than the sealant. In a final stage of the study, the cyclic fatigue resistance of the same two-component sealants was evaluated using tensile and shear fatigue tests. Results from the fatigue tests indicated that the high modulus sealants lost adhesion from the ALC substrate at an early stage in the test. As well, the fatigue resistance of test specimens with joints having three-sided adhesion was lower than that of specimens having normally configured joints with adhesion on two sides of the sealant. Therefore, on the basis of results derived from all the studies, it was determined that a suitable sealant for use on ALC substrates is a sealant having a low modulus that is applied in the normal fashion as a two-sided joint. Copyright © 2012 by ASTM International.
Publication date
AffiliationNational Research Council Canada (NRC-CNRC); Construction
Peer reviewedYes
NPARC number21269555
Export citationExport as RIS
Report a correctionReport a correction
Record identifier9d662482-b330-449c-9b27-73e59bb087f5
Record created2013-12-12
Record modified2017-04-05
Bookmark and share
  • Share this page with Facebook (Opens in a new window)
  • Share this page with Twitter (Opens in a new window)
  • Share this page with Google+ (Opens in a new window)
  • Share this page with Delicious (Opens in a new window)
Date modified: