Some factors affecting drainage of moisture from wet insulation in flat roofs

  1. (PDF, 1 MB)
  2. Get@NRC: Some factors affecting drainage of moisture from wet insulation in flat roofs (Opens in a new window)
AuthorSearch for:
ConferenceSymposium on Moisture Migration in Buildings: 06 October 1980, Philadelphia, PA, USA
Pages2840; # of pages: 13
SubjectRoofing; moisture content; flat roofs; drainage; thermal insulation; wet insulation; flat roofs; drainage; drying; thermal insulation; moisture; Roofs; Moisture performance; Couvertures; degre hygrometrique; toiture terrasse; drainage; isolation thermique
AbstractMoisture often finds its way into flat roofs where it causes a reduction in the thermal resistance of the insulations and sometimes leads to the destruction of the roofing system. Various methods for removing moisture have been studied, but effective drying is usually difficult to achieve because the natural forces acting to remove moisture are small. Some moisture may be drained from wet roofs, but because the slope is small or nonexistent and absorptive forces tend to retain moisture it is not usually an effective method. If the retentive forces can be overcome, however, drainage rates can be substantially increased. In one outdoor study carried out on an experimental roof deck with 2 percent slope glass fiber, perlite-fiber, and wood fiber insulations were found to drain very slowly. Of the moisture contained in the insulation at the outset less than 25 percent drained out in the first 4 months of test. In a second, laboratory study tests were carried out on a deck 2.4 m long with slopes of 2, 4, and 8 percent using a variety of underlays beneath wet glass fiber insulation. Drainage was slow when a plastic sheet underlay was used, but rates were higher with soil and vermiculite-asphalt underlays. The fourth underlay, polyester fabric, produced drainage rates that varied with deck, slope, and length of flap allowed to hang down at the end of the deck. This flap provides a suction force that increases the rate of moisture flow. As an example, moisture content was reduced from over 70 percent to less than 5 percent by volume in a period of 4 days with a slope of 2 percent and a 75 mm flap.
Publication date
AffiliationNRC Institute for Research in Construction; National Research Council Canada
Peer reviewedYes
NRC number20984
NPARC number20378460
Export citationExport as RIS
Report a correctionReport a correction
Record identifier14b05592-15ae-4259-a7ea-00ceef9504fb
Record created2012-07-24
Record modified2016-05-09
Bookmark and share
  • Share this page with Facebook (Opens in a new window)
  • Share this page with Twitter (Opens in a new window)
  • Share this page with Google+ (Opens in a new window)
  • Share this page with Delicious (Opens in a new window)
Date modified: